Talk:Change log

Version 1.0: More Information or Less?

Regarding including more information for Version 1.0: Throughout the change log, FC has included recipes, descriptions, asides, and rationales. It's not out of character for the initial post to include all of this info. Ideally, you'd be able to read through the log and, by piling revision upon revision, be able to reconstruct the tech tree. You can't do that if you don't have all the information at the start. I propose that the revision revert to the full content of FC's original post. I'm not sure how more information can't possibly be more useful than less.MattW (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (MDT)

The info you are talking about is the kind of info FlowerChild would add to the original post of the Minecraft forums

When adding new items to the changelog, he would write Added Nethercoal item or Added the Detector Block. Hence Added Hibachi and Added Lightblock is what the release version would look like if he included it in the changelog

He really only went into specific detail with changes to existing items, blocks etc. He was documenting bug fixes and content changes. The new descriptions and rationales were added to the original post

This page is a changelog, not the original post. Since most of FlowerChilds changes were in order of the tech tree you already can do what you want just by following hyperlinks

If you want a updated original post on this wiki, create a page for it. MrShifty on the MCF combined the outdated original post with error fixes I posted to create a error free original post https://www.dropbox.com/s/eian4s3oob6xh1u/BTW.pdf Mind you FlowerChild said he is going to do a significant rewrite one he finishes BTW and only FlowerChild knows the level of spoilers he would want on the original post Palisight (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2014 (MDT) 22:24, 9 June 2014 (MDT)