Difference between revisions of "Talk:Change log"
(Propose reverting version 1.0 back to the full text of FC's historic forum post. Please explain why this is not desired.) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =Version 1.0: More Information or Less?= | ||
Regarding including more information for Version 1.0: Throughout the change log, FC has included recipes, descriptions, asides, and rationales. It's not out of character for the initial post to include all of this info. Ideally, you'd be able to read through the log and, by piling revision upon revision, be able to reconstruct the tech tree. You can't do that if you don't have all the information at the start. I propose that the revision revert to the full content of FC's original post. I'm not sure how more information can't possibly be more useful than less.[[User:MattW|MattW]] ([[User talk:MattW|talk]]) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (MDT) | Regarding including more information for Version 1.0: Throughout the change log, FC has included recipes, descriptions, asides, and rationales. It's not out of character for the initial post to include all of this info. Ideally, you'd be able to read through the log and, by piling revision upon revision, be able to reconstruct the tech tree. You can't do that if you don't have all the information at the start. I propose that the revision revert to the full content of FC's original post. I'm not sure how more information can't possibly be more useful than less.[[User:MattW|MattW]] ([[User talk:MattW|talk]]) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (MDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:26, 9 June 2014
Version 1.0: More Information or Less?
Regarding including more information for Version 1.0: Throughout the change log, FC has included recipes, descriptions, asides, and rationales. It's not out of character for the initial post to include all of this info. Ideally, you'd be able to read through the log and, by piling revision upon revision, be able to reconstruct the tech tree. You can't do that if you don't have all the information at the start. I propose that the revision revert to the full content of FC's original post. I'm not sure how more information can't possibly be more useful than less.MattW (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2014 (MDT)
